Den Tofarvede Studiegruppe

16ø OF.2.10 in print 24 is not pos. 71 but pos. 73. (This is only a typing error in his "Supplement..., 5. udgave 31/12/2005 pg. 3.) See three-strip 16ø24 71-73 and please note, that pos. 72 has an OM.2:

16ø OF.2.11 in print 20 can be found on pos. 45 - see attached pair 16ø20 44-45, where pos. 44 shows OF.2.32:
(Position 45 er et af de sidste grå felter i 16ø20 - tillykke til Bernd, kommentar LVH)

To your request 35/16 øre tryk 31 pos. 51 omv.rm. OF.2.6 from June 12 I have attached two scans (one detailed) of my copy (without overprint), which looks quite different from Per Møllers stamp. My impression is, that this is "only" print 32, where the colours are sometimes definitely ligh...

To your request 35/16 øre tryk 31 pos. 51 omv.rm. OF.2.6 from June 12 I have attached two scans (one detailed) of my copy (without overprint), which looks quite different from Per Møllers stamp. My impression is, that this is "only" print 32, where the colours are sometimes definitely ligh...

Wieder 'mal ein interssantes Puzzle von Dir !? Zunächst einmal die Feststellung, dass die Zeichnung bei LN korrekt ist !! Ich habe sie gerade mit dem Ganzbogen der 4ø18B aus dem Postmuseum und den Kopien der Schäffer-Sammlung verglichen,alle Marken auf Position B3 haben die Kerbe im Rahmen unten rec...

Concerning your question the full sheet of the Postal Museum shows this frame-flaw on position 95.

The OF on 16ø10 pos. 50 can also be seen on the sheet (pos.1-80) of the postal museum. I don't know, if LN had overlooked it, or if he thought that this OF is only a "tryktilfældighed".